Sen. Hilary Clinton continues to lead the protectionist rampage on the political front, she has yet to provide any hints as to her solutions to the various problems that are certain to arise should she win and enact her regulations. Protectionism has both positive and negative effects, the later of which Clinton ignores.
I doubt anyone questions the concern over the amount of outsourcing that has taken place since the early 1990s. Something needs to be done to revitalize the US economy, that isn't debatable. The methods for achieving the end means is where politicians and economists seem to differ.
Clinton tends to suggest that Protectionism will help keep jobs inside of US borders, lower the trade deficit and ultimately act beneficial to the overall economic well-being. She doesn't seem to realize that the trade deficit has no net affect on the United States. Entities and people trade, not countries. She should be more focused on U.S. GDP Growth rates because various factors influence trade, including tariffs, tax rates in respective countries and currency conversion rates.
If you look at Hilary's plan, implementing policies to force companies and Americans to buy home-grown products will certainly result in significant spikes in inflation. She doesn't seem to have any grasp of this concept. If strong tariffs or other protective measures are enacted, those goods that will be then produced by workers in America will most definitely be higher in price due to the wage and benefits difference.
Another key consequence on protectionism is a stronger US Dollar. Although some argue that would be beneficial for the United States and her citizens, this would only hold true when trading or converting currency or wealth with other countries. An inflated currency has proven to be part of the problem with outsourcing because a higher USD makes foreign imports cost less and become more attractive. This is a central factor in the massive import problem the US faces. Should the USD fall relative to the Asian currencies, which it still has yet to do, demand for US exports will rise dramatically.
The double edge sword comes into affect if the US Dollar were to fall too quickly, lowering the value of personal wealth and ultimately creating inflation simultaneously. By any means, the situation is complex and fragile, something Sen. Clinton needs to realize soon.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Protectionism is a double-edged sword
Posted by
Mike
at
5:19 PM
2
comments
Labels: 2008 Election, 2008 President, 2008 Presidential Election, American, Asia, China, Chinese Economy, Deficit, Democrats, Economic Policy, Economics, Foreign Policy, GDP, GDP Growth, Globalization, Inflation, Manufacturing, Monetary Policy, Outsourcing, Personal Income, Protectionism, Treasuries, Unemployment, United States, US Dollar, US Economy, Yen
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Good numbers for the U.S. Economy
More good numbers came out today, suggesting a recession is not likely in the near term for the United States economy like some economists such as Paul Krugman and Barry Ritholz. Let's start with the bad numbers.
Pending Home Sales came in at -4.9% against projections of 0.4% increase due to spring buying habits. Part of this number may be due to the cold snaps felt throughout the early part of the spring. I wouldn't be surprised to see that number rally this month.
Now on to the good news. The ISM Manufacturing Index rose to 54.7%, a new 52-week high. With the good manufacturing numbers came a sharp decline in bond rates, a move that will help support the stock market's rally.
Source: Marketwatch
Yesterday several strong numbers came out including personal income and DPI, each rose by 0.7%. Improvement in income leads to higher consumer spending and eventually GDP growth, corporate profits and a bullish stock market. The PCE inflation measure was flat, signaling slowing inflation. This is key considering inflationary worries and concern over the FED hiking rates if inflation maintains high levels. Gold prices also dipped, strengthening the dollar and lowering commodity prices.
Posted by
Mike
at
11:11 PM
1 comments
Labels: Bonds, Core Inflation, DPI, Economic Policy, Economics, Equity Market, Euro, FED, FED Funds Rate, Finance, GDP, Gold, Housing, Inflation, Interest Rates, ISM, Manufacturing, PCE, Personal Income, Pound, Profits, Recession, Stock Market, US Dollar, US Economy